The other day I posed a question here: Are “Tiger Moms” happy? And though I tried to be as measured as possible, a few of my readers felt that my post was judgmental; not in keeping with my usual tone here.
My initial reaction to being thought judgmental: “NOOOOO!!”
But I reflected on this all the way home from New York, and came to a conclusion. While I always try to look at things with an open mind, I do have some opinions about motherhood, and they do sometimes come through in my writing. In this case, I am feeling a little bit judgmental, and….well, I think I’m okay with that.
Bear with me here.
First, I think to know where I’m coming from, you have to read the book. We aren’t talking about your average strict or achievement-focused parent here; Chua describes forcing her daughters into daily 5- and 6-hour practice sessions (even while on family vacations,) threatening to burn their toys if they don’t practice. She writes almost gleefully about how hard mothering is and how wrapped up she is personally in her daughters’ successes or failings (like getting a B+, ever, which she says would be unthinkable.) She mocks her daughters and refers to screaming matches and “war zone” conditions in the house. It is safe to say that I don’t know a single person in real life who is even remotely like Amy Chua describes herself.
In fact, I’m not sure anyone I know could be like Amy Chua, even if they wanted to. After all, even if we all believed her way was best, it would take an incredible amount of time, innumerable resources, and endless energy, focus, and drive that not all of us have available every single day throughout our kids’ entire childhoods. That doesn’t make us bad, or lazy, or uncaring mothers.
So this is really much more about Amy Chua herself-and more about her as a writer than a mother-than the whole world of “Tiger Moms.” If we were simply talking about super high-achieving moms working toward super high-achieving kids, I’d be much more “to each her own” about it. After all, as Cagey wisely pointed out in her comment, we all value and prioritize different things. I’d never tell you that wishing success (of any sort) for your kids is wrong or not conducive to happy mothering.
But though Chua’s book is said to be a memoir, she has, in a way, put herself out there as an expert on a certain kind of high-achievement mothering-and with that comes responsibility. Chua is also openly critical of what she terms “Western parenting” and the lazy, slovenly, disrespectful jerks-of-kids it turns out. And to be honest, it kind of got to me. Reading Chua’s book my mind kept doing this erratic flip-flop between “I could never live like this!” and “What if my kids turn out to be shiftless, jobless, lazy, disrespectful jerks and I could have saved them from it if only I’d made them practice the violin for five hours a day?”
I’m a pretty self-assured parent. And yet, there is something in Chua’s glib recollections of endless battles and power struggles, of stopping at nothing to ensure her daughters’ excellence in every area of life, that made me doubt myself a little…to wonder whether I am really trying hard enough, or whether I’m shortchanging my kids by not forcing them to live up to their potential.
And you know what…forget that. I have been pretty consistent here on this blog with certain principles. Principles like: Parent in a way that feels right today, not out of fear of “what might happen” later. Don’t make motherhood harder than it has to be. It’s okay to let go of perfectionism. Pretty much the polar opposite of Chua’s stance, and while that doesn’t make her a bad mother, it doesn’t mean I agree with her either.
Ironically, there is much in Chua’s book that I do identify with, on a very basic level. I also don’t believe most kids will naturally do what’s best for them, that they often need guidance to make the right decisions. I believe in respect for elders and the importance of discipline (though compared to Amy Chua’s, my standards are hopelessly low.) So it’s not that I have a problem with moms insisting on good grades or making their kids practice the violin or forbidding sleepovers. In fact, I could probably stand to up my strictness ante every now and then. I would have appreciated a book that encouraged me to crack down a little harder now and then, that told me sometimes it’s OK to be the mean mom. (Lucky us! My good friend Denise is writing one!)
I just don’t go for fear-based, extremist parenting. I don’t think it’s good for us as mothers. I don’t think it creates happy homes. And needless to say, I don’t really like the idea of a book that sells itself by selling fear and a rigid version of ‘right.’ Let’s face it, if this Tiger Mom thing didn’t poke at our insecurities, we would have all given a collective “meh” and her book would not have ended up a New York Times bestseller. And though Chua gives lip service to having a change of heart near the end, it rings hollow. Whether that’s due to weak writing or bad editing or simply the fact that she’s still just as convinced of her rightness at the end of the book as at the beginning, I guess I can’t say.
It’s possible I completely misunderstood Chua’s intent with Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. Honestly, my uncertainty about whether I had really read her accurately was part of the reason I didn’t go into much detail in my previous post. But obviously, what I left out still came through loud and clear in my tone. I admit it: I judged Chua for appearing to judge me and mothers like me. Hey, I’m only human. But I do regret if I made anyone with “tiger mom leanings” feel bad.
I guess what it boils down to, for me, is that I believe:
- Mothers deserve to be happy;
- Functional, peaceful and enjoyable day-to-day family life is just as important a goal as some far-down-the-road outcome;
- My specific family would not do well using her approach, nor would I be able to keep it up for long without resentment or total breakdown,
- And therefore, the “Tiger Mom” lifestyle as defined by Amy Chua would make ME miserable, and therefore is not worth it to ME, no matter how outstanding the possible long-term results.
That’s really it, no more and no less. The way I keep it real is to be the kind of mom I am, and that’s definitely not a tiger. I just couldn’t be happy that way, and happy family life is at least as important to me as spotless academic records or training at top-rated music conservatories. And for many of us-if not most of us-I think at some point, with some kids, you have to pick one or the other.


I am glad you cleared that up, Meagan. I was horrified by that reader’s comment because it was so very off-target from what you have created here – a site where we can share our parenting experiences and opinions, without finger-pointing and censure.
Of course, we all have opinions about parenting and it is okay to share them. It is also reasonable to to back away and say “Hey, that doesn’t work for me and this is why.”
I missed your earlier post about the Tiger Mom, and I must admit, I haven’t read her book. I did read the NYT article with excerpts from it. I think I tweeted that if hers was the measurement of successful parenting, I fail. And then, for the most part, I forgot about it – because her comments are not the measurement of successful parenting to me. I’ve been watching with interest as the twittersphere and media have reacted to the whole thing, but don’t think it will change who I am. Now, my oldest is only 14, and although she does play violin (and plunks around at piano), I can guarantee you she doesn’t meet Chua’s standard. I’m still not anywhere near done with this mothering deal and I suppose she could yet become some complete failure. (Not too mention the 3 younger ones following behind). You know what? I’m okay with that, I guess. You know how many times “failure” was the word used for Albert Einstein? Eleanor Roosevelt? Harriet Tubman? Abraham Lincoln? and so many, many more… My hope is to raise all my kids to understand that everyone fails (probably even Tiger Mom, and “gasp” perhaps her daughters too) and when we do, we get to choose what to do next. We get to learn, grow and become more confident, compassionate, and maybe even wise. That’s what I hope to give my girls that and the security of knowing I will love them the same if they’re a brain surgeon, dentist, teacher, Peace Corps volunteer or janitor. And, I hope to someday be called a good mom, but probably never a tiger…
Hi!
I’ve read the book and her style of parenting wouldn’t work for me or my family. That being said, I did feel a bit defensive through all of her writing. She made me feel like I wasn’t pushing or expecting enough of my kids. The thing is, she went to the absolute extreme on both sides…sure, we all know that “western parent” style she described, but that’s not me. We all know the crazy intense parents too. Still not me. I wish at the end of the day, we as parents (especially moms) could just quit judging one another. I think we all want to do the best we can for our kids and what works for some won’t work for others. That’s all…:)
I absolutely put a great amount of energy into parenting my children. Not to be a profession parent, but as a calling. And I’m not such a tiger in academics-but with character-roar!
I am a step mother. My spouse parented his child with a woman who (in my opinion) has a very loose parenting style-it scares me! I can see the difference in how our children already are. His child is unable to be happy and at peace when he doesn’t get his way-there’s always a melt down- he has no sense of intercampus or way of finding his way back to the soundness. I had to explain to my spouse that I view bad character as a cavity that can eat away at my children (thus that saying spoiled rotten). For me loving them is pursuing a good character in them.
BUT-I am VERY much at peace and full of joy. I love my kids, and everything I do, and the way that I parent them, is ALWAYS on-looking toward the future-that’s how I determine what the right action is for me to take…in any given situation. What kind of husband, father, brother, sister, mother, wife will they be if I allow ‘this’ (attitude) to fester. Now yelling, shouting, anything like that-is not the way I parent-because it’s off target for how I want my kids to be. But I do put a lot of passion into my parenting and I am very serious about it.
You did great on TV, Meagan! Your take is so refreshing and reassuring. The Tiger Mom thing was very destabilizing for me, for a moment, but I totally agree that being happy, trusting your instincts and providing a warm and loving home is more important than producing a child prodigy.
Meagan,
I agree with you and thank you (great interview btw). I like the question “are YOU happy?” because perhaps she is, but I’m not sure that style of parenting would make for happy parents, family life or children.
I’ve been trying to articulate this lately and failing. Happiness isn’t pleasure, but a feeling of fulfillment, love, relationships, etc. If you have those in your life, you’re productive, which begats more happiness. If her style of happiness makes her happy, and a happy family life, more power to her.
Definitely doesn’t for us.
That said, I think her view that this is the “Chinese” way is out-dated. Shanghai has an educational system that’s been moving _away_ from this style of education and most urban Chinese children today are only children who often are coddled and pampered, i.e. “lazy Western” :). Seems to be working for them.
I meant to say “her style of PARENTING makes her happy” ?
I think it’s hard to not sound judgemental when we express opinions about things that are so different from our views. I think you did a good job of saying Chua’s parenting style would not make YOU happy.
I haven’t read the book, but I have read some of the articles, and I’ll admit that they made me feel highly defensive. Like Amy Chua thinks I’m a bad mother, dooming my children to a life of mediocrity.
That reaction in me is what leads to judgment on my part. And I think that’s pretty normal. When we feel judged, we often respond in kind. As you say, though, this is why her book has sold so well. So she’s got that going for her.
Loved watching your Fox appearance. You kept it so, dare I say, “fair and balanced” (-; and I loved hearing you articulate some of your “biggies.” Thanks for continuing the conversation on the topic here. I too am no Tiger Mom and am very at peace with that!